After reading the latest Egan’s work, I got
thinking about the Caribbean Islands. I understand that the Caribbean Islands
were discovered by successive explorers from Europe. I understand that Slaves
from Africa were taken to these Islands as were White Indentured Workers, a
polite name for White Slaves, by the people that had purchased Estates on these
Islands. In this process the Indigenous peoples of these Islands the Carib
Indians were to all intents and purposes wiped out, so for people of African
descent to claim that they have a right to present day Islands is a nonsense. Drawing
a parallel with the two factions in Egan’s work, I do not deny it benefited
some people, but don't kid ourselves that it boosted the living standards of
the ordinary people. This myth was invented back in the 50's or 60's by some
Caribbean professor to give those of African descent a sense of grievance
against those that imported their ancestors, mind you he stopped short of
saying that it was their fellow Africans that enslaved them in the first place.
I suspect the feeling of distrust is true of all Countries, it’s well known and
it’s called Xenophobia. That’s what a stake in Egan’s piece using the trappings
of SF. I’m not familiar with the immigration's issues regarding Australia (Greg
Egan’s home country), but I’m sure they must not be very different than the
ones facing the Caribbean back in the day. The Sivadier minority on Vesta in
Egan’s work is just a metaphor for other minorities trying to access better
living conditions. I don't go a day without a negative news story about Muslim
people in the news. It is constant. There is a definite issue of race at the
moment, though I do agree that is not all of it. People seem to prefer EU to
non-EU, and an American non-EU to a Pakistani non-EU person. Though it’s true
that the hostility has widened now and it seems to be going towards other
countries even in Portugal. Questioning whether the volume and strategy of
immigration is the right one, is very, very different from saying go home. I
think the saddest part of the last 60 years in Europe is the flux that most
families live in. Everyone is moving around, unless you are too poor or move or
rich enough to stay put. No-one has roots, and if they did they’d be unrecognisable
now compared to, say, 30 years ago. I think the oldest trick in the book is
claiming that people are 'scapegoating' immigrants when really the concept of
immigration to the European country as understood now, only really began post
war and has always been unpopular. People don't really care whether immigrants
are Polish or Bangladeshi, black or white, are coming to work or live on
benefits, in all honesty it's never been that popular an idea. People didn't
want their neighborhoods transformed, they didn't want to have their noses
rubbed in diversity, they didn't want the white population of a major European
city to become a minority and they didn't want middle class entertainers and journalists
who have joined the white flight exodus to excoriate them, almost simply for
being white. Everyone who has been a student of European history knows that’s
not the way to go. Nazi race ideology, master race and all that. They classed
Poles and other Slavs as “untermenschen”, close to animals.
Obviously there is precious little to be done
about it now, because the elite were never prepared to act on the public
concern that was expressed and for a long time people hoped things wouldn't get
worse much like the frog in a pot of cold water over the fire.
What Egan did was to put this theme into an
exceptional science fictional milieu and make it work. It’s not your usual Egan
mind you. His other books have been some of my favourites ever, but his short
stories are the hardest science fiction around. Nobody else has explored ideas
of quantum mechanics intersecting with biology and humanity like he does. I
think in this story what we have is Egan going just for the Humanities and also
making it work.
Greg Egan remains one of the few writers doing
exceptional SF in this day and age.

